Other FASB

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on October 5, 2022, and continued its initial deliberations by discussing the disaggregation approach for income statement expenses. The FASB decided to pursue an expense disaggregation approach whereby an entity would be required to reconcile any disaggregated information to the relevant expense caption presented in the income statement. The FASB decided not to require disclosure in total for any additional specific expenses or costs incurred.

The FASB also decided to refine the project scope to include any relevant expense line items. That means that the project’s scope applies to any expense line items on the income statement that contain certain types of underlying information. Those expense captions would be required to be disaggregated, depending on the types of underlying expenses the Board later decides to require. Additionally, the FASB directed its staff to focus its research on all business entities.

For more information, click here.

Joint Ventures – FASB Discusses Joint Venture Formations

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on September 14, 2022, and discussed deliberated sweep issues related to its project on joint venture formations.

Decisions made during this meeting, included the following:

Define formation date in the Master Glossary as the date on which an entity initially meets the definition of a joint venture.
Require that a joint venture recognize any negative goodwill (the net identifiable assets recognized by the joint venture in excess of the fair value of the joint venture as a whole) resulting from the formation transaction as an adjustment to equity.
Clarify the types of arrangements and business combinations guidance that a joint venture would analyze to determine whether transactions are separate from or part of the joint venture formation. The FASB decided that a joint venture would analyze whether any contingent payments to the venturers or employees are part of the joint venture formation or represent a transaction separate from the joint venture formation, while the business combinations guidance for preexisting relationships or acquisition-related costs would not apply.
Clarify that the formation date is always the measurement date and that if multiple transactions are accounted for as a single transaction, then the identifiable assets and liabilities would be recognized when they have satisfied the recognition criteria in Subtopic 805-20, Business Combinations—Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Noncontrolling Interest.
Require that any contingent arrangements deemed to be part of the joint venture formation and classified within assets or liabilities follow the guidance in Subtopic 805-20.
Provide guidance for scenarios in which the joint venture replaces share-based payment awards.

For more information, click here.

Investment in Tax Credit Structures – FASB Ratifies Consensus-for-Exposure

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on July 13, 2022, and ratified the consensus-for-exposure EITF 21-A, “Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method.” The FASB directed its staff to draft a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) reflecting the consensus-for-exposure for vote by written ballot.

For more information, click here.

FASB Agenda – FASB Discusses Agenda Prioritization

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on August 31, 2022 and discussed the results of staff research and analysis on an agenda request that highlights a perceived lack of certain disclosures related to the use of bank credit and services. The FASB decided not to add a project to its technical agenda.

For more information, click here.

Segment Reporting – FASB Discusses Segment Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on July 27, 2022 and discussed feedback from the external review of the staff draft of the proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU). The FASB also discussed two potential disclosures and a sweep issue that was identified from the external review of the staff draft.

The FASB reached a number of decisions, including the following:

Require that a public entity disclose the title and position of its Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM).
A public entity should disclose the nature of the expense information that the CODM uses to manage operations if the entity does not disclose significant expense categories and amounts under the significant expense principle for one or more of its reportable segments.
To permit a public entity to report multiple measures of a segment’s profit or loss.

For more information, click here.

Investment in Tax Credit Structures –FASB Ratifies Consensus-for-Exposure

For more information, click here.

Segment Reporting –FASB Discusses Segment Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on July 27, 2022, and discussed feedback from the external review of the staff draft of the proposed ASU. The FASB also discussed two potential disclosures and a sweep issue that was identified from the external review of the staff draft. Among other things, the FASB decided to require that a public entity disclose the title and position of its CODM.

The FASB had previously decided to require that a public entity disclose segment expenses under a significant expense principle. At this meeting, the FASB decided that a public entity should disclose the nature of the expense information that the CODM uses to manage operations if the entity does not disclose significant expense categories and amounts under the significant expense principle for one or more of its reportable segments.

For more information, click here.

Digital Assets –FASB Discusses Accounting for Exchange-Traded Digital Assets and Commodities

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on May 11, 2022, and discussed whether to add a project to its technical agenda to address the accounting for exchange-traded digital assets and commodities. The FASB added a project to its technical agenda to improve the accounting for and disclosure of certain digital assets.

The FASB decided not to add to its technical agenda a project that would address the accounting for exchange-traded commodities; however, the chair decided that this topic would remain a research agenda project.

The FASB is expected to consider potential scope alternatives for digital assets at a future meeting.

For more information, click here.

Interim Reporting –FASB Discusses Narrow-Scope Improvements to Interim Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on May 25, 2022, and discussed feedback received on the proposed Accounting Standards Update, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Disclosure Framework—Changes to Interim Disclosure Requirements, and feedback received on the June 2021 Invitation to Comment, Agenda Consultation.

The FASB decided that the project objective is to improve the Codification guidance in Topic 270 by clarifying when the guidance in Topic 270 is applicable and improving the navigability of the required interim disclosures.

In furthering this objective, the FASB directed its staff that the future amendments to the disclosure principle should be intended to complement the interim disclosure requirements in Topic 270.

The FASB affirmed the amendments to the objective of Topic 270 to provide guidance on accounting and disclosure issues specific to interim reporting and to set forth disclosure requirements for interim financial statements and notes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Additionally, the FASB decided to include all of the amendments in the proposed Update in the scope of redeliberations.

For more information, click here.

Exposure Draft - Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2022-001 —Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848 and Amendments to the Definition of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap Rate

Summary - The FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would extend the period of time preparers can utilize the reference rate reform relief guidance and expand the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)-based interest rates available as benchmark interest rates. Stakeholders are encouraged to review and provide feedback on the proposed ASU by June 6, 2022.

Issue 1: Proposed Sunset Date Deferral

In 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting.

The objective of the guidance in Topic 848 is to provide relief during the temporary transition period, so the FASB included a sunset provision within Topic 848 based on expectations of when the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) would cease being published. In 2021, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) delayed the intended cessation date of certain tenors of USD LIBOR to June 30, 2023.

To ensure the relief in Topic 848 covers the period of time during which a significant number of modifications may take place, the amendments in the proposed ASU would defer the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024, after which entities would no longer be permitted to apply the relief in Topic 848.

Issue 2: Proposed Amendments to the Definition of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap Rate

In 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, which added the term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap Rate (SOFR Swap Rate) to the Master Glossary of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®. The amendments in ASU No. 2018-16 also permitted a rate that meets the definition of the SOFR Swap Rate to be considered a benchmark interest rate and therefore eligible to be designated as the hedged risk for recognized fixed-rate financial instruments or a forecasted issuance or purchase of fixed-rate financial instruments.

In ASU No. 2018-16, the FASB stated that the definition of the SOFR Swap Rate was specific to the OIS rate based on SOFR and that it would monitor the developments of the forward-looking, term-based version of the SOFR rate (SOFR term) and consider including SOFR term as a benchmark interest rate in the future. Based on the developments of SOFR term in the marketplace, the proposed ASU would amend the definition of the SOFR Swap Rate to include other versions of SOFR, such as SOFR term, as a benchmark interest rate under Topic 815.

For more information, click here.

FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2022-02 —Financial Instruments —Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures

Summary - The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2022-02, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, intended to improve the usefulness of information provided to investors about certain loan refinancings, restructurings, and writeoffs.

FASB Chair Richard R. Jones stated, “The new ASU responds to feedback we received from investors and other stakeholders during our extensive post-implementation review (PIR) of the credit losses standard. The amendments create a single model for loan modification accounting by creditors while providing improved loan modification and writeoff disclosures.”

Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors That Have Adopted CECL

During the FASB’s PIR of the credit losses standard, including a May 2021 roundtable, investors and other stakeholders questioned the relevance of the troubled debt restructuring (TDR) designation and the usefulness of disclosures about those modifications. Some noted that measurement of expected losses under the CECL model already incorporates losses realized from restructurings that are TDRs and that relevant information for investors would be better conveyed through enhanced disclosures about certain modifications.

The amendments in the new ASU eliminate the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors that have adopted CECL while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.

Vintage Disclosures—Gross Writeoffs

The disclosure of gross writeoff information by year of origination was cited by numerous investors as an essential input to their analysis. To address this feedback, the amendments in the new ASU require that a public business entity disclose current-period gross writeoffs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investment in leases.

For more information, click here.

FASB Agenda –SEC Acting Chief Accountant Discusses FASB Agenda

Summary - SEC Acting Chief Accountant Paul Munter issued a Statement on the FASB’s Agenda Consultation: Engagement with Investors and Other Stakeholders Vital to Development of High Quality Accounting Standards. Munter indicates that it “is critically important that the FASB, and the Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation (the “FAF”) in its important oversight role over the FASB, continue to improve processes for obtaining and considering investor and other stakeholder feedback, and for clearly communicating with those stakeholders regarding how that feedback has impacted the standard-setting process. On behalf of Commission staff in OCA, in this statement, we highlight below why engagement with investors and other stakeholders is vital to the FASB’s ability to develop high quality accounting and financial reporting standards, and we provide observations on the FASB’s standard-setting process, its agenda consultation, and the related ITC feedback from investors and other stakeholders.”

Munter discusses the importance of investors and other stakeholders to the standard-setting process. Also included in the statement is observations of the FASB’s agenda consultation. Munter indicated that in the FASB’s “decisions to add projects to its agenda or make changes to its standards, the FASB should clearly make the case for change, whether through a preliminary yet robust analysis of the need for a project or through an explanation of its consideration of the expected costs and benefits of a change. In the FASB’s consideration of what would provide decision-useful information to investors, and in making the case for change, it should consider costs to both preparers and users, including the costs to users from not making needed improvements to accounting and disclosure requirements.”

For more information, click here.

2021 FASB Investor Outreach Report

Summary - The FASB has issued its 2021 Investor Outreach Report (Report), which highlights the investor outreach completed by the FASB staff over the last year.

The outreach included engagement in more than 430 investor interactions. Substantially all the interactions were the result of outreach aimed at soliciting investor perspectives, including buy-side portfolio managers and analysts, sell-side analysts, accounting analysts (both buy-side and sell-side), credit rating agency analysts and managers, individual investors, and private company lenders and other capital providers (e.g., venture capital/private equity).

In addition to the issuance of the Report, the FASB launched an investor web portal to provides information on projects of interest to investors, investor-focused educational videos on specific standards, and how investors can share their views on all FASB activities.

For more information, click here.

Intangible Assets – FASB Discusses Identifiable Intangible Assets and Subsequent Accounting for Goodwill

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on November 17, 2021, and discussed identifiable intangible assets and subsequent accounting for goodwill. Specifically, the FASB discussed staff research and analysis on the elements of an estimated goodwill amortization model. This discussion involved an overall amortization period estimation principle, a possible list of factors, providing a cap and floor on the amortization period, and the reassessment of an estimated goodwill amortization period. The FASB made no decisions at this meeting.

For more information, click here.

FASB Agenda – FASB Discusses its Agenda

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB me on December 15, 2021, and discussed stakeholder feedback received on its June 2021 Invitation to Comment, Agenda Consultation. In response to feedback received, FASB Chair Rich Jones announced comprehensive changes to the FASB research agenda. The FASB’s research agenda will be comprised of the following projects (in no particular order):

Accounting for Exchange-Traded Digital Assets and Commodities: This research project will explore accounting for and disclosure of a subset of exchange-traded digital assets and exchange-traded commodities.
Accounting for and Disclosure of Intangibles: This research project will consider potential ways to improve the accounting for and disclosure of intangibles, including software costs, internally developed intangibles, and research and development.
Hedge Accounting Phase 2: This research project will seek stakeholder feedback that could bring further alignment of hedge accounting with risk management activities beyond the targeted improvements made to the hedge accounting model in Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, and consider changes to the definition of a derivative.
Accounting for Financial Instruments with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)-Linked Features and Regulatory Credits: This research project will explore accounting for and disclosure of financial instruments with ESG-linked features and regulatory credits.
Accounting for Government Grants, Invitation to Comment: This research project will solicit feedback on whether the requirements in IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, should be incorporated into GAAP.
Agenda Consultation: This research project will solicit feedback about the financial reporting issues that the Board should consider adding to its agenda and the priority of those issues.

The FASB staff also updated the board on its progress on the reference rate reform—fair value hedging project. The FASB directed the staff to perform additional outreach and research. The Board made no decisions.

Regarding reference rate reform—deferral of the sunset date of Topic 848, the FASB decided to add a project to the technical agenda to defer the sunset date of Topic 848, Reference Rate Reform. The FASB also decided to defer the sunset date of the guidance in Topic 848 to December 31, 2024.

For more information, click here.

Segment Reporting –FASB Discusses Segment Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB me on December 8, 2021, and continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expense categories and amounts that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The FASB made the following decisions.

Multiple Segment Profit or Loss Measures
The FASB discussed whether to clarify which of a segment’s profit or loss measures the principle applies to when multiple measures are reported. The FASB decided that the principle should apply to all reported measures of a segment’s profit or loss.

Transition
The FASB discussed transition and decided that:

The proposed amendments should be applied retrospectively for each comparative period that an income statement is presented.
When applying the amendments retrospectively, a public entity should first apply the principle to identify the significant segment expense categories and amounts for the current period presented (that is, the period of adoption). The entity should then disclose the comparative period amounts for those same categories.

The FASB also decided that a public entity should provide a qualitative transition disclosure about certain changes to the segment expenses included in the management reports that are regularly provided to the CODM.

For more information, click here.

Segment Reporting –FASB Discusses Segment Reporting Disclosures

Summary - As discussed in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on October 13, 2021, and continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expense categories and amounts that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The FASB made a number decisions related to the principle, including:

Easily Computable Concept
The FASB decided to include the easily computable concept as part of the principle. That concept would require public entities to disclose significant segment expense categories and amounts that are easily computable from the management reports that are regularly provided to the CODM.

Mapping of Entity-Wide Amounts to the Income Statement Lines
Under the principle, each significant segment expense category disclosed should be based on the information that is regularly provided to the CODM and reconciled to its corresponding consolidated expense amount on an annual basis. The consolidated expense amount may not have a one-for-one relationship to an income statement line. The FASB considered whether to require public entities to map each consolidated expense amount to the income statement lines and decided not to include that as part of the proposed guidance.

Single Reportable Segment Entities
The FASB considered the implications of applying the principle and the existing segment disclosure requirements to single reportable segment entities. The FASB decided to specify that single reportable segment entities should apply all disclosure requirements in Topic 280, Segment Reporting, consistent with requirements for multiple reportable segment entities.

For more information, click here.

Revenue Recognition –FASB Improves Consistency in Accounting for Acquired Revenue Contracts

Summary - The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, that addresses diversity in practice related to the accounting for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination.

Under current GAAP, an acquirer generally recognizes assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, including contract assets and contract liabilities arising from revenue contracts with customers and other similar contracts that are accounted for in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, at fair value on the acquisition date.

The FASB indicates that some stakeholders indicated that it is unclear how an acquirer should evaluate whether to recognize a contract liability from a revenue contract with a customer acquired in a business combination after Topic 606 is adopted. Furthermore, it was identified that under current practice, the timing of payment (payment terms) of a revenue contract may subsequently affect the post-acquisition revenue recognized by the acquirer. To address this, the ASU requires entities to apply Topic 606 to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination.

Finally, the amendments in the ASU improve comparability after the business combination by providing consistent recognition and measurement guidance for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination and revenue contracts with customers not acquired in a business combination.

For more information, click here.

FASB Agenda –FASB Discusses Agenda Prioritization

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on September 22, 2021. During this meeting, the FASB staff provided an update on outstanding agenda requests. Additionally, the FASB discussed the results of staff research and analysis on three potential projects related to recent agenda requests.

The FASB decided to add a project to the Emerging Issues Task Force agenda to expand the proportional amortization method to investments in tax credits other than low income housing tax credit (LIHTC) investments. Additionally, the FASB decided that the current scope of the project will be to evaluate whether the current criteria for an investment to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method are operable for investments in tax credit structures other than LIHTC structures.

The FASB decided not to add the following potential projects to its agenda:
Embedded derivatives: equity-indexed annuities and modified coinsurance arrangements; and
Annuitization benefits: certain discount rate changes in other comprehensive income.

For more information, click here.

2021 FASB Investor Outreach Report

Summary - The FASB has issued its 2021 Investor Outreach Report (Report), which highlights the investor outreach completed by the FASB staff over the last year.

According to FASB Chair Richard J. Jones, “[i]nvestor perspectives are critical to the Board’s ability to develop effective standards, so we undertake a number of initiatives to proactively engage this stakeholder group in our standard-setting process. The report explains our investor outreach program, activities over the last year, how we’ll continue to build on those initiatives to enhance our investor outreach efforts, and, perhaps most importantly, how investors can share their views with us.”
In addition to the issuance of the Report, the FASB launched an investor web portal to provides information on projects of interest to investors, investor-focused educational videos on specific standards, and how investors can share their views on all FASB activities.

For more information, click here.

Segment Reporting – FASB Discusses Segment Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on March 10, 2021 and continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expenses that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. Among other things, the FASB decided:

That each significant expense category disclosed under the principle should be reconciled to its corresponding consolidated amount.
To retain the current expense disclosures in Topic 280 and that a public entity would be additionally required to comply with the principle.
A public entity would be required to disclose the following information by reportable segment irrespective of whether the CODM is regularly provided with this information: (a) an amount for other items that is the difference between segment revenue less the significant expenses disclosed under the principle and the segment profit or loss measure; and (b) a description of the composition of other items.

For more information, click here.

FASB Accounting Standards Updates - Accounting Standards Update No. 2021-01 —Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope

Summary - The FASB has published ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform. ASU 2021-01 clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that re affected by the discounting transition. The ASU also amends the expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 to capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition

For more information, click here.

Joint Ventures – FASB Discusses Accounting by a Joint Venture for Nonmonetary Assets Contributed by Investors

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on February 17, 2021 and continued its initial deliberations on the project. The FASB discussed disclosures, transition, and sweep issues. The FASB decided to:

Require that a joint venture formed after the effective date of the new guidance apply the measurement and recognition guidance upon formation prospectively. An existing joint venture entity would have an option to apply the new guidance retrospectively.
Require that a joint venture upon formation measure its net assets (including goodwill) using the fair value of the joint venture as a whole. Therefore, a joint venture would measure its total net assets upon formation as the fair value of 100 percent of the joint venture’s equity immediately after formation.

For more information, click here.

Segment Reporting – FASB Discusses Segment Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on January 20, 2021. The FASB continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expenses that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The FASB reached a number of decisions, including:

Applying the principle would involve the following steps: (1) An entity should identify segment expenses from the information that is regularly provided to the CODM; (2) The entity would then apply the significance threshold to determine which of those expenses should be disclosed.
The FASB discussed stakeholder feedback that the effect of the significance threshold within the principle may be perceived in different ways. The FASB decided to retain the significance threshold and make no further changes.
The FASB decided to include clarifying guidance that if a CODM is regularly provided with multiple sets of segment expenses that are measured under different accounting bases, the expenses to be reported under the principle should be those that are included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss.
The FASB considered stakeholder feedback that segment expenses are regularly provided to a CODM under various fact patterns, including when an amount for total segment expenses is provided or when segment expenses on a variance basis are provided.

For more information, click here.

Goodwill – FASB Discusses Interim Goodwill Evaluation

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on November 18, 2020, and discussed an issue related to the cost and complexity of private companies performing an interim goodwill triggering event evaluation. The FASB decided to:

Add a project to its technical agenda to address the cost and complexity associated with interim goodwill impairment testing for private companies and not-for-profit entities.
Introduce an accounting alternative that would allow entities within the scope of the guidance to perform a goodwill triggering event evaluation on the annual reporting date only.
Limit the scope of the alternative to entities that meet the definition of private companies and not-for-profit entities as those terms are defined in the Codification’s Master Glossary.
Limit the scope of the alternative to entities that report GAAP-compliant financial statements on an annual basis only.
Limit the scope of the alternative to goodwill that is tested for impairment in accordance with Subtopic 350-20, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Goodwill.
Not limit the guidance to a specified time period but instead make it available on an ongoing basis.
Require no additional disclosures beyond the current requirements in Topic 235, Notes to Financial Statements, and Subtopic 350-20.

For more information, click here.

Reference Rate Reform – FASB Discusses Scope of Topic 848

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on December 9, 2020 and discussed comment letter feedback received on its proposed ASU, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope Refinement.

For more information, click here.

FASB Agenda – FASB Discusses FASB Agenda

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on October 21, 2020, and discussed the results of staff research and outreach on five potential projects related to recent agenda requests.

The FASB decided to add the following projects to its technical agenda:

Disclosure of supplier finance programs involving trade payables
Consolidation of a not-for-profit entity by a for-profit sponsor.

The FASB decided not to add the following potential projects to its agenda:

Digital currencies
Change to diluted earnings per share reporting
Determining a lessee’s discount rate: when use of the rate implicit in a lease is required.

For more information, click here.

Exposure Draft - Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2020-900 —Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope Refinement

Summary - The FASB issued for public comment a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would clarify the scope of the FASB’s recent reference rate reform guidance. Stakeholders are asked to review and provide input on the proposed ASU by November 13, 2020.

Trillions of dollars in loans, derivatives, and other financial contracts reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the benchmark interest rate banks use to make short-term loans to each other. With global capital markets expected to move away from LIBOR, the FASB took on a project to help ease the potential accounting burden.

As a result of that project, in March 2020 the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04—Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. Topic 848 provides temporary, optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued.

Since then, stakeholders have raised questions about whether Topic 848 can be applied to derivative instruments that do not reference a rate that is expected to be discontinued but that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of reference rate reform. Stakeholders indicated that the modification, commonly referred to as the “discounting transition,” may have accounting implications. These stakeholders raised concerns about the need to reassess previous accounting determinations related to those contracts and about the hedge accounting consequences of the discounting transition.

The amendments in this proposed ASU would clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to contracts that are affected by the discounting transition. Amendments in this proposed ASU to the expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 are included to capture the incremental consequences of the proposed scope refinement and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition.

For more information, click here.

Exposure Draft - Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2020-800 —Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt —Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation —Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging —Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer's Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Forwards and Options (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)

Summary - The FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would clarify an issuer’s accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified forwards and options (e.g., warrants) that remain equity classified after modification. Stakeholders are asked to review and provide input on the proposed ASU by December 28, 2020.

The proposed ASU is based on a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF). The proposed ASU would provide guidance on how an issuer would measure and recognize the effect of these transactions. Specifically, it would provide a principles-based framework to determine whether an issuer would recognize the modification or exchange as an adjustment to equity or an expense.

For more information, click here.

FASB Accounting Standards Updates - No. 2020-07 —Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) —Presentation and Disclosures by Not-for-Profit Entities for Contributed Nonfinancial Assets

Summary - The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2020-07 Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Presentation and Disclosures by Not-for-Profit Entities for Contributed Nonfinancial Assets, intended to improve transparency in the reporting of contributed nonfinancial assets, also known as gifts-in-kind, for not-for-profit organizations.

Examples of contributed nonfinancial assets include fixed assets such as land, buildings, and equipment; the use of fixed assets or utilities; materials and supplies, such as food, clothing, or pharmaceuticals; intangible assets; and recognized contributed services.

The ASU requires a not-for-profit organization to present contributed nonfinancial assets as a separate line item in the statement of activities, apart from contributions of cash or other financial assets. It also requires a not-for-profit to disclose:

Contributed nonfinancial assets recognized within the statement of activities disaggregated by category that depicts the type of contributed nonfinancial assets; and
For each category of contributed nonfinancial assets recognized (as identified in (a)):
- Qualitative information about whether the contributed nonfinancial assets were either monetized or utilized during the reporting period. If utilized, a description of the programs or other activities in which those assets were used.
- The not-for-profit’s policy (if any) about monetizing rather than utilizing contributed nonfinancial assets.
- A description of any donor-imposed restrictions associated with the contributed nonfinancial assets.
- The valuation techniques and inputs used to arrive at a fair value measure, in accordance with the requirements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, at initial recognition.
- The principal market (or most advantageous market) used to arrive at a fair value measure if it is a market in which the recipient NFP is prohibited by a donor-imposed restriction from selling or using the contributed nonfinancial assets.

The amendments in this ASU should be applied on a retrospective basis and are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2021, and interim periods with annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022. Early adoption is permitted.

For more information, click here.

Software Development – New Edition of Interpretation on Software Development Costs and Cloud Computing Arrangements Published

We have published a new edition of our Interpretation, Accounting for Software Development Costs and Cloud Computing Arrangements. This new edition includes the following revisions and updates:

Made verbiage changes to reflect conforming changes to other GAAP guidance following the issuance of ASU 2018-15; and
Clarified the accounting for content development costs in a cloud computing arrangement.

For more information, click here.

FASB Agenda – FASB Discusses Agenda Prioritization

As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on July 29, 2020, and discussed the results of staff research and outreach on eight potential projects related to recent agenda requests and other implementation requests.
The FASB decided to add a targeted improvements project for Topic 842, Leases, to its technical agenda to address the following issues:

Sales-type leases with substantial variable lease payments
Remeasurement of lease payments based on a reference index or rate
Reduction of scope in a lease contract.

The FASB decided not to consider the issue on transition disclosures under Topic 842 as part of that project. The FASB decided to add a project to its technical agenda to address the effect of underwriter restrictions on fair value measurements and to add a project to its research agenda to evaluate the effects of other types of sale restrictions on fair value measurements.

For more information, click here.

FASB Accounting Standards Updates - No. 2020-04 —Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) —Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting

Summary - The FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that provides temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. This guidance is ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.

LIBOR and other interbank offered rates are widely used benchmark or reference rates in the United States and globally. Trillions of dollars in loans, derivatives, and other financial contracts reference LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate banks use to make short-term loans to each other.

With global capital markets expected to move away from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates toward rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation, the FASB launched a broad project in late 2018 to address potential accounting challenges expected to arise from the transition.

The new guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued.

The ASU is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. Therefore, it will be in effect for a limited time through December 31, 2022.

For more information, click here.

Debt vs. Equity – FASB Discusses Debt vs. Equity

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on February 5, 2020, and continued redeliberating the amendments in proposed ASU, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. The FASB reached a number of decisions, including:

Clarify the scope of the guidance in Subtopic 470-20 for convertible debt instruments and in Subtopic 505-10, Equity—Overall, for convertible preferred stock.
Clarify the difference between a convertible debt and a debt instrument that could be converted to a variable number of shares with an aggregate fair value equal to a fixed monetary amount (such as share-settled debt).
Require that an entity apply the if-converted method of calculating diluted EPS to all convertible instruments and that interest expense not be added back to the numerator for convertible debt instruments if the principal is required to be settled in cash.
Exclude certain share-based payment arrangements (instruments that are liability-classified in accordance with guidance in paragraph 718-10-25-15) from the scope of the EPS amendments on instruments that may be settled in cash or shares.
Clarify that the reassessment guidance in paragraph 815-40-35-8 applies to both freestanding instruments and embedded features (similar to the scope as written in paragraph 815-40-15-5).
Add a cross-reference in Section 815-40-35 to the guidance in Subtopic 815-15, Derivatives and Hedging—Embedded Derivatives, on the accounting for embedded features upon a change in assessment of the derivatives scope exception.

For more information, click here.

FASB Agenda – FASB Discusses Agenda Prioritization

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on September 18, 2019, and discussed the results of FASB staﬀ research on four potential projects related to six recent agenda requests.

The FASB added a project to the EITF agenda to address the issuers’ accounting for modiﬁcations of equity classiﬁed warrants, that is, equity classiﬁed freestanding call options that are outside the scope of Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, or Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The FASB limited the scope of the project to equity classiﬁed freestanding call options that remain equity classiﬁed after the modiﬁcations.

The FASB also added a project to its technical agenda on the accounting by a joint venture for contributions of nonmonetary assets by the ventures.

The FASB decided not to add the following potential projects to its agenda:

Acquired ﬁnancial assets in a business combination that do not meet the deﬁnition of purchased ﬁnancial assets with credit deterioration; and
Recognition and measurement of interest income.

For more information, click here.

FASB Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2019-760 —Financial Services —Insurance (Topic 944): Effective Date

Summary - The FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would grant all insurance companies that issue long-duration contracts, such as life insurance and annuities, additional time to apply a standard that addresses this area of financial reporting. Stakeholders are encouraged to review and provide comment on the proposed ASU by September 20, 2019.

On August 15, 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-12, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts. The ASU made targeted amendments to improve, simplify, and enhance the financial reporting requirements for long-duration contracts issued by insurance companies.

Since that time, the FASB received an agenda request to delay its effective date by one year. In response, FASB members and staff conducted outreach with numerous insurance companies that issue and/or reinsure long-duration contracts to better understand their implementation challenges and progress.

Furthermore, last week, the FASB issued a proposed ASU that describes a new FASB philosophy for determining how effective dates for major standards are staggered between larger public companies and all other entities. Under this philosophy, a major standard would first be effective for larger public companies; effective dates for all other public and private companies and organizations would be staggered at least two years later. Generally, it is expected that early application would continue to be permitted for all entities.

The proposed ASU would amend the effective dates for the long-duration insurance standard.

For more information, click here.

FASB Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2019-770 —Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting

Summary - The FASB has issued for public comment a proposed ASU that would provide temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for, or recognizing the effects of, reference rate reform on financial reporting. Comments on the proposed ASU are due by October 7, 2019.

Trillions of dollars in loans, derivatives, and other financial contracts reference LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate banks use to make short-term loans to each other. With global capital markets expected to move away from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates toward rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation, the FASB launched a broad project in late 2018 to address potential accounting challenges expected to arise from the transition.

If adopted as proposed, the ASU would provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships affected by reference rate reform. The guidance would apply only to contracts or hedging relationships that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform.

The guidance is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period and would therefore be in effect for a limited time. Accordingly, the guidance would be effective upon issuance of final guidance and would not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022.

For more information, click here.

Segment Reporting – FASB Discusses Segment Reporting and Other Matters

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on July 23, 2019. The FASB held educational sessions on the following topics:
• Segment reporting;
• Primary financial statements/financial performance reporting;
• Financial instruments with characteristics of equity/distinguishing liabilities from equity;
• IBOR reform/reference rate reform;
• Goodwill and impairment/identifiable intangible assets and subsequent accounting for goodwill;
• Disclosure initiative/disclosure framework;
• Implementation of the revenue (Topic 606, IFRS 15) and leases (Topic 842, IFRS 16) standards; and
• The FASB’s project on effective date consideration for private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and small public companies.

No decisions were made.

For more information, click here.

FASB Discusses Improvements to Segment Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on May 29, 2019, and discussed improvements to segment reporting. As part of developing the topics for a study on segment disclosures, the FASB discussed options to both require that segment information be reported in a financial statement format and require additional general disclosures in Topic 280, Segment Reporting.

The FASB discussed the merits of the financial statement format alternative. Because the complexities related to that alternative would likely overwhelm the other issues included in the study, the FASB decided to exclude that alternative from the study. However, the FASB directed the staff to undertake research into how the segment reconciliation requirements could be improved.

The FASB also directed the staff to study the effect of including additional general segment disclosure requirements.

The FASB gave permission for the staff to proceed with the study.

For more information, click here.

FASB Discusses Financial Performance Reporting

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on April 24, 2019, and discussed an internal view approach to disaggregating income statement expense information. The FASB staff identified and explained the main issues and alternatives for FASB consideration on that approach and the draft preparer outreach materials. The goal of the internal view approach is to disaggregate income statement expense information based on how management internally views consolidated expenses.

The FASB directed its staff to proceed with outreach, affirmed the staff’s outreach strategy, and recommended several types of entities for outreach efforts. Additionally, the FASB highlighted areas for the staff to focus on during outreach with preparers and users.

The FASB directed its staff to conduct outreach with preparers on the operability of the internal view approach as well as other follow-on issues and to conduct outreach with users in order to understand the usefulness of potential outcomes from the internal view approach.

For more information, click here.

FASB Discusses Agenda Prioritization

Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on May 8, 2019 and discussed the results of staff research on six potential projects related to eight recent agenda requests and a technical inquiry.The Board decided to add the following projects to the EITF agenda:

Financial Instruments—Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Investments—Equity Securities, and Topic 323, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures.
Revenue Recognition—Contract Modifications of Licenses of Intellectual Property.

The FASB also decided to expand the scope of its project, Improving the Accounting for Asset Acquisitions and Business Combinations, to include the accounting for in-process research and development and contingent consideration obligations recognized upon the initial consolidation of a variable interest entity that is not a business.The FASB decided not to add the following potential projects to its agenda:

Collective Defined Contribution Plans and the Definition of a Defined Contribution Plan
Share Repurchase Disclosures—Price and Earnings Per Share Effects; or
Accounting for Emissions Trading and Other Environmental Market Transactions.

The FASB also decided to remove the project, Measurement Alternative and Observable Transactions Identified after the Reporting Date, from its research agenda.

For more information, click here.

Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) - Updating the Definition of Collections - FASB ASU 2019-03

Summary - The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2019-03, Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Updating the Definition of Collections.

These amendments modify the definition of the term collections and require that a collection-holding entity disclose its policy for the use of proceeds from when collection items are deaccessioned (i.e., removed from a collection). If a collection-holding entity has a policy that allows proceeds from deaccessioned collection items to be used for direct care, it should disclose its definition of direct care.

The amendments apply to all entities, including business entities, that maintain collections. However, accounting for collections is primarily an issue for certain not-for-profit (NFP) entities because collections often are held by museums; botanical gardens; libraries; aquariums; arboretums; historic sites; planetariums; zoos; art galleries; nature, science, and technology centers; and similar educational, research, and public service organizations that have those divisions.

The amendments are effective for annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application of the amendments is permitted. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis.

For more information, click here.

Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960); Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962); Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965): Employee Benefit Plan Master Trust Reporting

Summary - Among other things, the amendments require a plan’s interest in that master trust and any change in that interest to be presented in separate line items in the statement of net assets available for benefits and in the statement of changes in net assets available for benefits, respectively.

The amendments also remove the requirement to disclose the percentage interest in the master trust for plans with divided interests and require that all plans disclose the dollar amount of their interest in each of those general types of investments.

The amendments require all plans to disclose: (a) their master trust’s other asset and liability balances; and (b) the dollar amount of the plan’s interest in each of those balances.

Lastly, the amendments eliminate redundant investment disclosures (e.g., those required by Topics 815 and 820) relating to 401(h) account assets.

Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to each period for which financial statements are presented.

For more information, click here.

Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made

Summary - These amendments clarify and improve the scope and accounting guidance around contributions of cash and other assets received and made by not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) and business enterprises.

The ASU clarifies and improves current guidance about whether a transfer of assets, or the reduction, settlement, or cancellation of liabilities, is a contribution or an exchange transaction. It provides criteria for determining whether the resource provider is receiving commensurate value in return for the resources transferred which, depending on the outcome, determines whether the organization follows contribution guidance or exchange transaction guidance in the revenue recognition and other applicable standards.

It also provides a more robust framework for determining whether a contribution is conditional or unconditional, and for distinguishing a donor-imposed condition from a donor-imposed restriction. This is important because such classification affects the timing of contribution revenue and expense recognition.

The new ASU does not apply to transfers of assets from governments to businesses.

For a public business entity or a not-for-profit entity that has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market for transactions in which the entity serves as a resource recipient to annual periods beginning after June 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. For all other entities, the requirements are effective for transactions in which the entity serves as a resource recipient to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019.

An entity that is either a public business entity or a not-for-profit entity (NFP) that has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market should apply ASU No. 2018-08 for transactions in which the entity serves as a resource provider to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. All other entities should apply ASU No. 2018-08 for transactions in which the entity serves as the resource provider to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted.

For more information, click here.

Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808) – Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606 – FASB ASU No. 2018-18

Summary - The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the Interaction Between Topic 808 and Topic 606, that clarifies the interaction between the guidance for certain collaborative arrangements and the Revenue Recognition financial accounting and reporting standard.

A collaborative arrangement is a contractual arrangement under which two or more parties actively participate in a joint operating activity and are exposed to significant risks and rewards that depend on the activity’s commercial success. The ASU provides guidance on how to assess whether certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for within the revenue recognition standard.

The ASU also provides more comparability in the presentation of revenue for certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants. It accomplishes this by allowing organizations to only present units of account in collaborative arrangements that are within the scope of the revenue recognition standard together with revenue accounted for under the revenue recognition standard. The parts of the collaborative arrangement that are not in the scope of the revenue recognition standard should be presented separately from revenue accounted for under the revenue recognition standard.

For public companies, the amendments in ASU No. 2018-18 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other organizations, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. Early adoption is permitted.

For more information, click here.

Employee Benefit Plan Master Trust Reporting - ASU 2017-06

Summary - Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to each period for which financial statements are presented.

Among other things, the amendments require a plan's interest in that master trust and any change in that interest to be presented in separate line items in the statement of net assets available for benefits and in the statement of changes in net assets available for benefits, respectively.

The amendments require all plans to disclose: (a) their master trust's other asset and liability balances; and (b) the dollar amount of the plan's interest in each of those balances.

Lastly, the amendments eliminate redundant investment disclosures (e.g., those required by Topics 815 and 820) relating to 401(h) account assets.

Earliest Effective Annual period (years beginning or ending after) December 15, 2018.

For more information, click here.

Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Targeted Improvements - FASB Proposed ASU 2018-240

Summary - The FASB has released a proposed Accounting Standard Update (ASU), Collaborative Arrangement (Topic 808): Targeted Improvements.

The amendments in this proposed ASU would affect all entities that have collaborative arrangements. If adopted as proposed, this proposal would make targeted improvements to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for collaborative arrangements as follows:

Add unit-of-account guidance in Topic 808 to align with the guidance in Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (i.e., a distinct good or service) limited to when an entity is assessing the scope of Topic 606;
Clarify that certain transactions between collaborative participants should be accounted for as revenue under Topic 606 when the collaborative participant is a customer in the context of the unit of account. In these situations, all of the guidance in Topic 606 should be applied, including recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements; and
Clarify that in a transaction that is not directly related to sales to third parties, presenting the transaction as revenue would be precluded if the collaborative participant counterparty is not a customer.

For more information, click here.

FASB Discusses Agenda Prioritization

Summary - As reported in its "Summary of Board Decisions" publication, the FASB met on March 28, 2018, and discussed the results of its staff's research on the following five potential projects:

Determining a Highly Inflationary Economy;
Interest Rate Lock Commitments;
Misalignment of Collections Definition;
Cost Capitalization for Episodic Television Series; and
Recognition under Topic 805 for an Assumed Liability in a Revenue Contract.

For more information, click here.

Collaborative Arrangements - FASB Discusses Targeted Improvements and Other Matters

Summary - As reported in its "Summary of Board Decisions" publication, the FASB met on February 7, 2018, and discussed the project scope for potential improvements to Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements, based on the feedback received during workshops held with stakeholders in December 2017. The FASB decided to retain the current scope of the project. The current scope includes certain transactions between participants of a collaborative arrangement; it excludes transactions directly related to sales to third parties. The current scope clarifies when certain transactions are within the scope of the revenue guidance; it does not include the development of a model for the financial reporting for non-revenue transactions.

On the remaining issues for deliberations, the FASB decided the following:

Entities would be required to apply the amendments resulting from the proposed ASU using a retrospective approach. The amendments would be required to be applied retrospectively as of an entity’s adoption date of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, subject to modification using the practical expedients in paragraph 606-10-65-1(h).
Additional recurring disclosures should not be required as a result of the targeted improvements, given the existing disclosures in Topics 606 and 808.

The FASB concluded that it received sufficient information and analysis to make an informed decision on the expected costs of the targeted improvements. Subject to what it learns from comment letters, the FASB believes that the expected benefits of the targeted improvements justify the expected costs. The FASB authorized its staff to draft a proposed Update for vote by written ballot that will be issued for public comment for a 45-day comment period.

For more information, click here.

FASB Discusses Future Agenda Items

Summary - As reported in its "Summary of Board Decisions" publication, the FASB met on September 20, 2017, and discussed: (1) the results of staff research and analysis on the projects included in the FASB Invitation to Comment, Agenda Consultation, and (2) the status of its research agenda. The FASB reached a number of decisions, including the following:

Intangibles. The FASB decided to remove the holistic project on Intangibles from its research agenda and maintain a component on its research agenda focused on developing qualitative disclosures about intangibles as part of the overall disclosure framework project. The FASB also decided to combine the following two projects on its research agenda: (a) Accounting for Identifiable Intangible Assets in a Business Combination for Public Business Entities (PBEs) and Not-for-Profit Entities (NFPs) and (b) Subsequent Accounting for Goodwill for PBEs and NFPs.

Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans. The FASB decided to remove from its research agenda a project on pensions and other postretirement benefit plans.

Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Including Convertible Debt). The FASB decided to add to its agenda a project on distinguishing liabilities from equity. The objective of the project is to improve understandability and reduce complexity (without loss of information for users). The project will focus on indexation and settlement (in the context of the derivative scope exception), convertible debt, disclosures, and earnings-per-share.

Financial Performance Reporting. The FASB decided to add a project to its agenda to focus on the disaggregation of performance information. The project would consider disaggregation either through presentation in the income statement or through disclosure in the notes. The project would base the disaggregation on requiring functional lines to be disaggregated into natural components. The FASB also retained a component of the project on its research agenda associated with improving the structure of the performance statement and developing an operating performance measure.

Segment Reporting. The FASB decided to add a project to its agenda on segment reporting. The objective of the project is to improve the segment aggregation criteria and to improve the disclosure requirements.

For more information, click here.

FASB Discusses Conceptual Framework Project

Summary - As reported in its "Summary of Board Decisions" publication, the FASB met on October 11, 2017, and discussed working definitions of revenues and expenses, which are currently defined in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial Statements, and the relationship of those definitions with the definitions of gains and losses. The FASB provided the following tentative leanings and reactions to the working definitions:

Retain the phrase or other activities in the working definitions of revenues and expenses to ensure the terms are sufficiently inclusive.
Excluding the phrase carrying out from the working definitions was an improvement.
Not remove the phrase that constitute the entity's ongoing major or central operations in the working definitions at this time.

The FASB directed its staff to develop working definitions of gains and losses in order to further analyze whether the phrase that constitute the entity's major or central operations can be excluded from the working definitions of revenues and expenses.

For more information, click here.

Conceptual Framework - FASB Discusses the Conceptual Framework Elements

Summary - As reported in its "Summary of Board Decisions" publication, the FASB met on August 30, 2017, and discussed working definitions of an asset and a liability. The FASB decided to eliminate the terms probable, future economic benefits, sacrifices of economic benefits, and past transactions or events from the FASB's revised definitions. The FASB directed its staff to further analyze whether the term control is necessary in the definition of an asset.

For more information, click here.

Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958) - Clarifying the Scope and Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made - FASB Proposed ASU 2017-270

Summary - The FASB has issued a proposed Accounting Standard Update (ASU) to clarify and improve the scope and the accounting guidance for contributions received and made, primarily by not-for-profits. Stakeholders are asked to review and provide comment on the proposed ASU by November 1, 2017.

The proposed ASU helps organizations decide if transactions should be accounted for as a contribution or an exchange. Organizations would accomplish this by using clarifying guidance to evaluate whether a resource provider is receiving value in return for the resources transferred.

The proposed ASU also helps organizations evaluate such arrangements by using an improved framework to determine whether a contribution is conditional or unconditional, and better distinguish a donor-imposed condition from a donor-imposed restriction

Accounting for contributions is an issue primarily for not-for-profit organizations because contributions are a significant source of revenue. However, the amendments in this proposed ASU would apply to all organizations that receive or make contributions of cash and other assets, including business enterprises.

The proposed amendments would not apply to transfers of assets from the government to businesses. The guidance would apply to both a recipient of contributions received and a resource provider of contributions made.

The proposed standard follows the same effective dates as ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:

A public company or a not-for-profit organization that has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market would apply the new standard to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that annual period.
Other organizations would apply the standard to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019.

Early adoption would be permitted irrespective of the early adoption of the amendments in ASC Topic 606.

For more information, click here.

FASB Invitation to Comment 2016-290 - Agenda Consultation

Summary - The FASB has issued for public comment an Invitation to Comment-Agenda Consultation. The purpose of this document is to solicit feedback about the financial reporting issues that the FASB considers adding to its agenda. The FASB requests feedback about the following:

Are the financial reporting issues described in this ITC areas for which there is potential for significant improvement?
What is the priority of addressing each issue?
What approach should the FASB take to address each issue?
Are there other major areas of financial reporting not described in this ITC that the FASB should consider adding to its agenda?

Comments are due by October 17, 2016.

For more information, click here.