Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on May 11, 2022, and discussed whether to add a project to its technical agenda to address the accounting for exchange-traded digital assets and commodities. The FASB added a project to its technical agenda to improve the accounting for and disclosure of certain digital assets.
The FASB decided not to add to its technical agenda a project that would address the accounting for exchange-traded commodities; however, the chair decided that this topic would remain a research agenda project.
The FASB is expected to consider potential scope alternatives for digital assets at a future meeting.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Decisions” publication, the FASB met on May 25, 2022, and discussed feedback received on the proposed Accounting Standards Update, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Disclosure Framework—Changes to Interim Disclosure Requirements, and feedback received on the June 2021 Invitation to Comment, Agenda Consultation.
The FASB decided that the project objective is to improve the Codification guidance in Topic 270 by clarifying when the guidance in Topic 270 is applicable and improving the navigability of the required interim disclosures.
In furthering this objective, the FASB directed its staff that the future amendments to the disclosure principle should be intended to complement the interim disclosure requirements in Topic 270.
The FASB affirmed the amendments to the objective of Topic 270 to provide guidance on accounting and disclosure issues specific to interim reporting and to set forth disclosure requirements for interim financial statements and notes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Additionally, the FASB decided to include all of the amendments in the proposed Update in the scope of redeliberations.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would extend the period of time preparers can utilize the reference rate reform relief guidance and expand the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)-based interest rates available as benchmark interest rates. Stakeholders are encouraged to review and provide feedback on the proposed ASU by June 6, 2022.
Issue 1: Proposed Sunset Date Deferral
In 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting.
The objective of the guidance in Topic 848 is to provide relief during the temporary transition period, so the FASB included a sunset provision within Topic 848 based on expectations of when the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) would cease being published. In 2021, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) delayed the intended cessation date of certain tenors of USD LIBOR to June 30, 2023.
To ensure the relief in Topic 848 covers the period of time during which a significant number of modifications may take place, the amendments in the proposed ASU would defer the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024, after which entities would no longer be permitted to apply the relief in Topic 848.
Issue 2: Proposed Amendments to the Definition of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap Rate
In 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, which added the term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap Rate (SOFR Swap Rate) to the Master Glossary of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®. The amendments in ASU No. 2018-16 also permitted a rate that meets the definition of the SOFR Swap Rate to be considered a benchmark interest rate and therefore eligible to be designated as the hedged risk for recognized fixed-rate financial instruments or a forecasted issuance or purchase of fixed-rate financial instruments.
In ASU No. 2018-16, the FASB stated that the definition of the SOFR Swap Rate was specific to the OIS rate based on SOFR and that it would monitor the developments of the forward-looking, term-based version of the SOFR rate (SOFR term) and consider including SOFR term as a benchmark interest rate in the future. Based on the developments of SOFR term in the marketplace, the proposed ASU would amend the definition of the SOFR Swap Rate to include other versions of SOFR, such as SOFR term, as a benchmark interest rate under Topic 815.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2022-02, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, intended to improve the usefulness of information provided to investors about certain loan refinancings, restructurings, and writeoffs.
FASB Chair Richard R. Jones stated, “The new ASU responds to feedback we received from investors and other stakeholders during our extensive post-implementation review (PIR) of the credit losses standard. The amendments create a single model for loan modification accounting by creditors while providing improved loan modification and writeoff disclosures.”
Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors That Have Adopted CECL
During the FASB’s PIR of the credit losses standard, including a May 2021 roundtable, investors and other stakeholders questioned the relevance of the troubled debt restructuring (TDR) designation and the usefulness of disclosures about those modifications. Some noted that measurement of expected losses under the CECL model already incorporates losses realized from restructurings that are TDRs and that relevant information for investors would be better conveyed through enhanced disclosures about certain modifications.
The amendments in the new ASU eliminate the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors that have adopted CECL while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.
Vintage Disclosures—Gross Writeoffs
The disclosure of gross writeoff information by year of origination was cited by numerous investors as an essential input to their analysis. To address this feedback, the amendments in the new ASU require that a public business entity disclose current-period gross writeoffs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investment in leases.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Acting Chief Accountant Paul Munter issued a Statement on the FASB’s Agenda Consultation: Engagement with Investors and Other Stakeholders Vital to Development of High Quality Accounting Standards. Munter indicates that it “is critically important that the FASB, and the Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation (the “FAF”) in its important oversight role over the FASB, continue to improve processes for obtaining and considering investor and other stakeholder feedback, and for clearly communicating with those stakeholders regarding how that feedback has impacted the standard-setting process. On behalf of Commission staff in OCA, in this statement, we highlight below why engagement with investors and other stakeholders is vital to the FASB’s ability to develop high quality accounting and financial reporting standards, and we provide observations on the FASB’s standard-setting process, its agenda consultation, and the related ITC feedback from investors and other stakeholders.”
Munter discusses the importance of investors and other stakeholders to the standard-setting process. Also included in the statement is observations of the FASB’s agenda consultation. Munter indicated that in the FASB’s “decisions to add projects to its agenda or make changes to its standards, the FASB should clearly make the case for change, whether through a preliminary yet robust analysis of the need for a project or through an explanation of its consideration of the expected costs and benefits of a change. In the FASB’s consideration of what would provide decision-useful information to investors, and in making the case for change, it should consider costs to both preparers and users, including the costs to users from not making needed improvements to accounting and disclosure requirements.”
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB has issued its 2021 Investor Outreach Report (Report), which highlights the investor outreach completed by the FASB staff over the last year.
The outreach included engagement in more than 430 investor interactions. Substantially all the interactions were the result of outreach aimed at soliciting investor perspectives, including buy-side portfolio managers and analysts, sell-side analysts, accounting analysts (both buy-side and sell-side), credit rating agency analysts and managers, individual investors, and private company lenders and other capital providers (e.g., venture capital/private equity).
According to FASB Chair Richard J. Jones, “[i]nvestor perspectives are critical to the Board’s ability to develop effective standards, so we undertake a number of initiatives to proactively engage this stakeholder group in our standard-setting process. The report explains our investor outreach program, activities over the last year, how we’ll continue to build on those initiatives to enhance our investor outreach efforts, and, perhaps most importantly, how investors can share their views with us.”
In addition to the issuance of the Report, the FASB launched an investor web portal to provides information on projects of interest to investors, investor-focused educational videos on specific standards, and how investors can share their views on all FASB activities.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on November 17, 2021, and discussed identifiable intangible assets and subsequent accounting for goodwill. Specifically, the FASB discussed staff research and analysis on the elements of an estimated goodwill amortization model. This discussion involved an overall amortization period estimation principle, a possible list of factors, providing a cap and floor on the amortization period, and the reassessment of an estimated goodwill amortization period. The FASB made no decisions at this meeting.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB me on December 15, 2021, and discussed stakeholder feedback received on its June 2021 Invitation to Comment, Agenda Consultation. In response to feedback received, FASB Chair Rich Jones announced comprehensive changes to the FASB research agenda. The FASB’s research agenda will be comprised of the following projects (in no particular order):
The FASB staff also updated the board on its progress on the reference rate reform—fair value hedging project. The FASB directed the staff to perform additional outreach and research. The Board made no decisions.
Regarding reference rate reform—deferral of the sunset date of Topic 848, the FASB decided to add a project to the technical agenda to defer the sunset date of Topic 848, Reference Rate Reform. The FASB also decided to defer the sunset date of the guidance in Topic 848 to December 31, 2024.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB me on December 8, 2021, and continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expense categories and amounts that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The FASB made the following decisions.
Multiple Segment Profit or Loss Measures
The FASB discussed whether to clarify which of a segment’s profit or loss measures the principle applies to when multiple measures are reported. The FASB decided that the principle should apply to all reported measures of a segment’s profit or loss.
Transition
The FASB discussed transition and decided that:
The FASB also decided that a public entity should provide a qualitative transition disclosure about certain changes to the segment expenses included in the management reports that are regularly provided to the CODM.
For more information, click here.
© 2022 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As discussed in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on October 13, 2021, and continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expense categories and amounts that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The FASB made a number decisions related to the principle, including:
Easily Computable Concept
The FASB decided to include the easily computable concept as part of the principle. That concept would require public entities to disclose significant segment expense categories and amounts that are easily computable from the management reports that are regularly provided to the CODM.
Mapping of Entity-Wide Amounts to the Income Statement Lines
Under the principle, each significant segment expense category disclosed should be based on the information that is regularly provided to the CODM and reconciled to its corresponding consolidated expense amount on an annual basis. The consolidated expense amount may not have a one-for-one relationship to an income statement line. The FASB considered whether to require public entities to map each consolidated expense amount to the income statement lines and decided not to include that as part of the proposed guidance.
Single Reportable Segment Entities
The FASB considered the implications of applying the principle and the existing segment disclosure requirements to single reportable segment entities. The FASB decided to specify that single reportable segment entities should apply all disclosure requirements in Topic 280, Segment Reporting, consistent with requirements for multiple reportable segment entities.
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, that addresses diversity in practice related to the accounting for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination.
Under current GAAP, an acquirer generally recognizes assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, including contract assets and contract liabilities arising from revenue contracts with customers and other similar contracts that are accounted for in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, at fair value on the acquisition date.
The FASB indicates that some stakeholders indicated that it is unclear how an acquirer should evaluate whether to recognize a contract liability from a revenue contract with a customer acquired in a business combination after Topic 606 is adopted. Furthermore, it was identified that under current practice, the timing of payment (payment terms) of a revenue contract may subsequently affect the post-acquisition revenue recognized by the acquirer. To address this, the ASU requires entities to apply Topic 606 to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination.
Finally, the amendments in the ASU improve comparability after the business combination by providing consistent recognition and measurement guidance for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination and revenue contracts with customers not acquired in a business combination.
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on September 22, 2021. During this meeting, the FASB staff provided an update on outstanding agenda requests. Additionally, the FASB discussed the results of staff research and analysis on three potential projects related to recent agenda requests.
The FASB decided to add a project to the Emerging Issues Task Force agenda to expand the proportional amortization method to investments in tax credits other than low income housing tax credit (LIHTC) investments. Additionally, the FASB decided that the current scope of the project will be to evaluate whether the current criteria for an investment to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method are operable for investments in tax credit structures other than LIHTC structures.
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB has issued its 2021 Investor Outreach Report (Report), which highlights the investor outreach completed by the FASB staff over the last year.
The outreach included engagement in more than 430 investor interactions. Substantially all the interactions were the result of outreach aimed at soliciting investor perspectives, including buy-side portfolio managers and analysts, sell-side analysts, accounting analysts (both buy-side and sell-side), credit rating agency analysts and managers, individual investors, and private company lenders and other capital providers (e.g., venture capital/private equity).
According to FASB Chair Richard J. Jones, “[i]nvestor perspectives are critical to the Board’s ability to develop effective standards, so we undertake a number of initiatives to proactively engage this stakeholder group in our standard-setting process. The report explains our investor outreach program, activities over the last year, how we’ll continue to build on those initiatives to enhance our investor outreach efforts, and, perhaps most importantly, how investors can share their views with us.”
In addition to the issuance of the Report, the FASB launched an investor web portal to provides information on projects of interest to investors, investor-focused educational videos on specific standards, and how investors can share their views on all FASB activities.
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on March 10, 2021 and continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expenses that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. Among other things, the FASB decided:
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB has published ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform. ASU 2021-01 clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that re affected by the discounting transition. The ASU also amends the expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 to capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on February 17, 2021 and continued its initial deliberations on the project. The FASB discussed disclosures, transition, and sweep issues. The FASB decided to:
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on January 20, 2021. The FASB continued its deliberations of a principle-based disclosure requirement to report the significant segment expenses that are both: (1) regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM); and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The FASB reached a number of decisions, including:
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on November 18, 2020, and discussed an issue related to the cost and complexity of private companies performing an interim goodwill triggering event evaluation. The FASB decided to:
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on December 9, 2020 and discussed comment letter feedback received on its proposed ASU, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope Refinement.
For more information, click here.
© 2021 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on October 21, 2020, and discussed the results of staff research and outreach on five potential projects related to recent agenda requests.
The FASB decided to add the following projects to its technical agenda:
The FASB decided not to add the following potential projects to its agenda:
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued for public comment a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would clarify the scope of the FASB’s recent reference rate reform guidance. Stakeholders are asked to review and provide input on the proposed ASU by November 13, 2020.
Trillions of dollars in loans, derivatives, and other financial contracts reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the benchmark interest rate banks use to make short-term loans to each other. With global capital markets expected to move away from LIBOR, the FASB took on a project to help ease the potential accounting burden.
As a result of that project, in March 2020 the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04—Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. Topic 848 provides temporary, optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued.
Since then, stakeholders have raised questions about whether Topic 848 can be applied to derivative instruments that do not reference a rate that is expected to be discontinued but that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of reference rate reform. Stakeholders indicated that the modification, commonly referred to as the “discounting transition,” may have accounting implications. These stakeholders raised concerns about the need to reassess previous accounting determinations related to those contracts and about the hedge accounting consequences of the discounting transition.
The amendments in this proposed ASU would clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to contracts that are affected by the discounting transition. Amendments in this proposed ASU to the expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 are included to capture the incremental consequences of the proposed scope refinement and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition.
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would clarify an issuer’s accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified forwards and options (e.g., warrants) that remain equity classified after modification. Stakeholders are asked to review and provide input on the proposed ASU by December 28, 2020.
The proposed ASU is based on a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF). The proposed ASU would provide guidance on how an issuer would measure and recognize the effect of these transactions. Specifically, it would provide a principles-based framework to determine whether an issuer would recognize the modification or exchange as an adjustment to equity or an expense.
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2020-07 Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Presentation and Disclosures by Not-for-Profit Entities for Contributed Nonfinancial Assets, intended to improve transparency in the reporting of contributed nonfinancial assets, also known as gifts-in-kind, for not-for-profit organizations.
Examples of contributed nonfinancial assets include fixed assets such as land, buildings, and equipment; the use of fixed assets or utilities; materials and supplies, such as food, clothing, or pharmaceuticals; intangible assets; and recognized contributed services.
The ASU requires a not-for-profit organization to present contributed nonfinancial assets as a separate line item in the statement of activities, apart from contributions of cash or other financial assets. It also requires a not-for-profit to disclose:
The amendments in this ASU should be applied on a retrospective basis and are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2021, and interim periods with annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022. Early adoption is permitted.
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
We have published a new edition of our Interpretation, Accounting for Software Development Costs and Cloud Computing Arrangements. This new edition includes the following revisions and updates:
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on July 29, 2020, and discussed the results of staff research and outreach on eight potential projects related to recent agenda requests and other implementation requests.
The FASB decided to add a targeted improvements project for Topic 842, Leases, to its technical agenda to address the following issues:
The FASB decided not to consider the issue on transition disclosures under Topic 842 as part of that project. The FASB decided to add a project to its technical agenda to address the effect of underwriter restrictions on fair value measurements and to add a project to its research agenda to evaluate the effects of other types of sale restrictions on fair value measurements.
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that provides temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. This guidance is ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.
LIBOR and other interbank offered rates are widely used benchmark or reference rates in the United States and globally. Trillions of dollars in loans, derivatives, and other financial contracts reference LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate banks use to make short-term loans to each other.
With global capital markets expected to move away from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates toward rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation, the FASB launched a broad project in late 2018 to address potential accounting challenges expected to arise from the transition.
The new guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued.
The ASU is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. Therefore, it will be in effect for a limited time through December 31, 2022.
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on February 5, 2020, and continued redeliberating the amendments in proposed ASU, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. The FASB reached a number of decisions, including:
For more information, click here.
© 2020 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on September 18, 2019, and discussed the results of FASB staff research on four potential projects related to six recent agenda requests.
The FASB added a project to the EITF agenda to address the issuers’ accounting for modifications of equity classified warrants, that is, equity classified freestanding call options that are outside the scope of Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, or Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The FASB limited the scope of the project to equity classified freestanding call options that remain equity classified after the modifications.
The FASB also added a project to its technical agenda on the accounting by a joint venture for contributions of nonmonetary assets by the ventures.
The FASB decided not to add the following potential projects to its agenda:
For more information, click here.
© 2019 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) that would grant all insurance companies that issue long-duration contracts, such as life insurance and annuities, additional time to apply a standard that addresses this area of financial reporting. Stakeholders are encouraged to review and provide comment on the proposed ASU by September 20, 2019.
On August 15, 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-12, Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts. The ASU made targeted amendments to improve, simplify, and enhance the financial reporting requirements for long-duration contracts issued by insurance companies.
Since that time, the FASB received an agenda request to delay its effective date by one year. In response, FASB members and staff conducted outreach with numerous insurance companies that issue and/or reinsure long-duration contracts to better understand their implementation challenges and progress.
Furthermore, last week, the FASB issued a proposed ASU that describes a new FASB philosophy for determining how effective dates for major standards are staggered between larger public companies and all other entities. Under this philosophy, a major standard would first be effective for larger public companies; effective dates for all other public and private companies and organizations would be staggered at least two years later. Generally, it is expected that early application would continue to be permitted for all entities.
The proposed ASU would amend the effective dates for the long-duration insurance standard.
For more information, click here.
© 2019 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB has issued for public comment a proposed ASU that would provide temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for, or recognizing the effects of, reference rate reform on financial reporting. Comments on the proposed ASU are due by October 7, 2019.
Trillions of dollars in loans, derivatives, and other financial contracts reference LIBOR, the benchmark interest rate banks use to make short-term loans to each other. With global capital markets expected to move away from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates toward rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation, the FASB launched a broad project in late 2018 to address potential accounting challenges expected to arise from the transition.
If adopted as proposed, the ASU would provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships affected by reference rate reform. The guidance would apply only to contracts or hedging relationships that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform.
The guidance is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period and would therefore be in effect for a limited time. Accordingly, the guidance would be effective upon issuance of final guidance and would not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022.
For more information, click here.
© 2019 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its “Summary of Board Decisions” publication, the FASB met on July 23, 2019. The FASB held educational sessions on the following topics:
• Segment reporting;
• Primary financial statements/financial performance reporting;
• Financial instruments with characteristics of equity/distinguishing liabilities from equity;
• IBOR reform/reference rate reform;
• Goodwill and impairment/identifiable intangible assets and subsequent accounting for goodwill;
• Disclosure initiative/disclosure framework;
• Implementation of the revenue (Topic 606, IFRS 15) and leases (Topic 842, IFRS 16) standards; and
• The FASB’s project on effective date consideration for private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and small public companies.
No decisions were made.
For more information, click here.
Summary - The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2019-03, Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Updating the Definition of Collections.
These amendments modify the definition of the term collections and require that a collection-holding entity disclose its policy for the use of proceeds from when collection items are deaccessioned (i.e., removed from a collection). If a collection-holding entity has a policy that allows proceeds from deaccessioned collection items to be used for direct care, it should disclose its definition of direct care.
The amendments apply to all entities, including business entities, that maintain collections. However, accounting for collections is primarily an issue for certain not-for-profit (NFP) entities because collections often are held by museums; botanical gardens; libraries; aquariums; arboretums; historic sites; planetariums; zoos; art galleries; nature, science, and technology centers; and similar educational, research, and public service organizations that have those divisions.
The amendments are effective for annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application of the amendments is permitted. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis.
For more information, click here.
© 2019 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - Among other things, the amendments require a plan’s interest in that master trust and any change in that interest to be presented in separate line items in the statement of net assets available for benefits and in the statement of changes in net assets available for benefits, respectively.
The amendments also remove the requirement to disclose the percentage interest in the master trust for plans with divided interests and require that all plans disclose the dollar amount of their interest in each of those general types of investments.
The amendments require all plans to disclose: (a) their master trust’s other asset and liability balances; and (b) the dollar amount of the plan’s interest in each of those balances.
Lastly, the amendments eliminate redundant investment disclosures (e.g., those required by Topics 815 and 820) relating to 401(h) account assets.
Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to each period for which financial statements are presented.
For more information, click here.
© 2019 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - These amendments clarify and improve the scope and accounting guidance around contributions of cash and other assets received and made by not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) and business enterprises.
The ASU clarifies and improves current guidance about whether a transfer of assets, or the reduction, settlement, or cancellation of liabilities, is a contribution or an exchange transaction. It provides criteria for determining whether the resource provider is receiving commensurate value in return for the resources transferred which, depending on the outcome, determines whether the organization follows contribution guidance or exchange transaction guidance in the revenue recognition and other applicable standards.
It also provides a more robust framework for determining whether a contribution is conditional or unconditional, and for distinguishing a donor-imposed condition from a donor-imposed restriction. This is important because such classification affects the timing of contribution revenue and expense recognition.
The new ASU does not apply to transfers of assets from governments to businesses.
For a public business entity or a not-for-profit entity that has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market for transactions in which the entity serves as a resource recipient to annual periods beginning after June 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. For all other entities, the requirements are effective for transactions in which the entity serves as a resource recipient to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019.
An entity that is either a public business entity or a not-for-profit entity (NFP) that has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market should apply ASU No. 2018-08 for transactions in which the entity serves as a resource provider to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. All other entities should apply ASU No. 2018-08 for transactions in which the entity serves as the resource provider to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted.
For more information, click here.
© 2019 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the Interaction Between Topic 808 and Topic 606, that clarifies the interaction between the guidance for certain collaborative arrangements and the Revenue Recognition financial accounting and reporting standard.
A collaborative arrangement is a contractual arrangement under which two or more parties actively participate in a joint operating activity and are exposed to significant risks and rewards that depend on the activity’s commercial success. The ASU provides guidance on how to assess whether certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for within the revenue recognition standard.
The ASU also provides more comparability in the presentation of revenue for certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants. It accomplishes this by allowing organizations to only present units of account in collaborative arrangements that are within the scope of the revenue recognition standard together with revenue accounted for under the revenue recognition standard. The parts of the collaborative arrangement that are not in the scope of the revenue recognition standard should be presented separately from revenue accounted for under the revenue recognition standard.
For public companies, the amendments in ASU No. 2018-18 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other organizations, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. Early adoption is permitted.
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - As reported in its "Summary of Board Decisions" publication, the FASB met on February 7, 2018, and discussed the project scope for potential improvements to Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements, based on the feedback received during workshops held with stakeholders in December 2017. The FASB decided to retain the current scope of the project. The current scope includes certain transactions between participants of a collaborative arrangement; it excludes transactions directly related to sales to third parties. The current scope clarifies when certain transactions are within the scope of the revenue guidance; it does not include the development of a model for the financial reporting for non-revenue transactions.
On the remaining issues for deliberations, the FASB decided the following:
The FASB concluded that it received sufficient information and analysis to make an informed decision on the expected costs of the targeted improvements. Subject to what it learns from comment letters, the FASB believes that the expected benefits of the targeted improvements justify the expected costs. The FASB authorized its staff to draft a proposed Update for vote by written ballot that will be issued for public comment for a 45-day comment period.
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The FASB has issued a proposed Accounting Standard Update (ASU) to clarify and improve the scope and the accounting guidance for contributions received and made, primarily by not-for-profits. Stakeholders are asked to review and provide comment on the proposed ASU by November 1, 2017.
The proposed ASU helps organizations decide if transactions should be accounted for as a contribution or an exchange. Organizations would accomplish this by using clarifying guidance to evaluate whether a resource provider is receiving value in return for the resources transferred.
The proposed ASU also helps organizations evaluate such arrangements by using an improved framework to determine whether a contribution is conditional or unconditional, and better distinguish a donor-imposed condition from a donor-imposed restriction
Accounting for contributions is an issue primarily for not-for-profit organizations because contributions are a significant source of revenue. However, the amendments in this proposed ASU would apply to all organizations that receive or make contributions of cash and other assets, including business enterprises.
The proposed amendments would not apply to transfers of assets from the government to businesses. The guidance would apply to both a recipient of contributions received and a resource provider of contributions made.
The proposed standard follows the same effective dates as ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
Early adoption would be permitted irrespective of the early adoption of the amendments in ASC Topic 606.
For more information, click here.
© 2017 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.